''Much of Dali's work with his own identity took place within the surrealist movement, which he joined in 1929. Surrealism rejected the pragmatic, rationalist approach to life and art and initially basing it's ideas on Sigmund Freud's work on the unconscious, sought to revalue the dream and the imagination as central rather than marginal to human thought. Through their writings, poetry, the visual arts and in other ways, the surrealists blurred the boundaries between the rational and irrational, reality and fantasy, objective and subjective. Dali was welcomed as a powerful new imagination: 'It is perhaps with Dali that the windows of the mind are opened fully wide for the first time,' proclaimed Andre Breton, the movement's leader, in his preface to the painter's first Paris exhibition in 1929.''
'Salvador Dali A Mythology.' Dawn Ades (Author) and Fiona Bradley (Author), Tate Publishing (1st April 1999)
This paragraph is from the Introduction to the book mentioned above and adequately describes the relation between surrealism and the mind. It is interesting that surrealism was initially based on Freud's work on the unconscious mind. Surrealism was never intended to be completely random but to delve into the human subconscious and express feeling and emotion without the limitations of realism. In relation to my work I am interested in Dali's paranoiac-critical method. This is a surrealist technique that was developed by Dali in 1930. One of Dali's paintings he created using this method is 'Metamorphosis of Narcissus 1937'. The story of Narcissus originates from Greek Mythology where Narcissus, a young beauty who broke many hearts, fell in love with his own reflection in a pool of water. He could never have his love and the Gods turned him into a flower as a result.
Metamorphosis of Narcissus - Salvador Dali (1937) - Oil on Canvas |
Dali wrote the accompanying poem:
Another artist to paint Narcissus was Caravaggio during the baroque art movement. He used an entirely different approach. These are quite good examples of what effect using different styles has on the subject matter. I would normally thinnk that realism would convey something better as it would make something feel more'real'. But in this case I feel Dali's interpretation is more powerful. I'm not sure why. Possibly because it shows the consequence for Narcissus. He and the stone hand seem sturdy and grand and it is quite powerful that he becomes the stone. The composition and facial expression ini Carravagios painting are very powerful, though. Narcissus is conveyed as a young boy and seems more vulnerable.Narcissus,in his immobility,absorbed by his reflection with the digestive slowness of carnivorous plants,becomes invisible.There remains of him only the hallucinatingly white oval of his head,his head again more tender,his head, chrysalis of hidden biological designs,his head held up by the tips of the water's fingers,at the tips of the fingersof the insensate hand,of the terrible hand,of the mortal handof his own reflection.When that head slitswhen that head splitswhen that head bursts,it will be the flower,the new Narcissus,Gala - my Narcissus
Narcissus (1599) Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio - Oil on Canvas |
References:
Books:
Salvador Dali A Mythology.' Dawn Ades (Author) and Fiona Bradley (Author), Tate Publishing (1st April 1999)
Websites:
https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/dali-metamorphosis-of-narcissus-t02343
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamorphosis_of_Narcissus
http://www.artble.com/artists/caravaggio/paintings/narcissus